<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Improve Your Presence Online - Blog for Top Left Design &#187; Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.topleftdesign.com/blog/tag/language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.topleftdesign.com/blog</link>
	<description>Top Left Design&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:13:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Only the English Could Have Invented This Language</title>
		<link>http://www.topleftdesign.com/blog/2010/01/24/only-the-english-could-have-invented-this-language/</link>
		<comments>http://www.topleftdesign.com/blog/2010/01/24/only-the-english-could-have-invented-this-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Things we found]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topleftdesign.com/blog/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was sent by email so we thought we would share! (author unknown) We&#8217;ll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes, But the plural of ox becomes oxen, not oxes. One fowl is a goose, but two are called geese, Yet the plural of moose should never be meese. You may find a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was sent by email so we thought we would share! (author unknown)</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2944" title="Make your memory hook memorable" src="http://www.topleftdesign.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/ox1.gif" alt="Make your memory hook memorable" width="476" height="514" /></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes,<br />
But the plural of ox becomes oxen, not oxes.<br />
One fowl is a goose, but two are called geese,<br />
Yet the plural of moose should never be meese.<br />
You may find a lone mouse or a nest full of mice,<br />
Yet the plural of house is houses, not hice.</p>
<p>If the plural of man is always called men,<br />
Then shouldn&#8217;t the plural of pan be called pen?<br />
If I speak of my foot and show you my feet,<br />
And I give you a boot, would a pair be called beet?<br />
If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth,<br />
Why shouldn&#8217;t the plural of booth be called beeth?</p>
<p>Then one may be that, and three would be those,<br />
Yet hat in the plural would never be hose,<br />
And the plural of cat is cats, not cose.<br />
We speak of a brother and also of brethren,<br />
But though we say mother, we never say methren.<br />
Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him,<br />
But imagine the feminine: she, shis and shim!</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it &#8211; English is a crazy language.<br />
There is no egg in eggplant nor ham in hamburger;<br />
neither apple nor pine in pineapple.<br />
English muffins weren&#8217;t invented in England ..<br />
We take English for granted, but if we explore its paradoxes,<br />
we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square,<br />
and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig.</p>
<p>And why is it that writers write but fingers don&#8217;t fing,<br />
grocers don&#8217;t groce and hammers don&#8217;t ham?<br />
Doesn&#8217;t it seem crazy that you can make amends but not one amend.<br />
If you have a bunch of odds and ends<br />
and get rid of all but one of them, what do you call it?</p>
<p>If teachers taught, why didn&#8217;t preachers praught?<br />
If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat?<br />
Sometimes I think all the folks who grew up speaking English<br />
should be committed to an asylum for the verbally insane.</p>
<p>In what other language do people recite at a play and play at a recital?<br />
We ship by truck but send cargo by ship.<br />
We have noses that run and feet that smell.<br />
We park in a driveway and drive in a parkway.<br />
And how can a slim chance and a fat chance be the same,<br />
while a wise man and a wise guy are opposites?</p>
<p>You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language<br />
in which your house can burn up as it burns<br />
down, in which you fill in a form by filling it out,<br />
and in which an alarm goes off by going on.</p>
<p>And, in closing, if Father is Pop,  how come Mother&#8217;s not Mop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topleftdesign.com/blog/2010/01/24/only-the-english-could-have-invented-this-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

